Push for disclosure of Missouri medical marijuana records runs into veto threat

    The provision would require details on who owns medical marijuana businesses be turned over to legislative oversight committees

    The Missouri House floor for the 2019 State of the State address.
    The Missouri House chambers during the 2019 State of the State address (photo courtesy of the Missouri Governors Office).

    An effort by lawmakers to require disclosure of ownership information for businesses granted medical marijuana licenses was derailed on Thursday, when state regulators suggested a possible gubernatorial veto. 

    On Tuesday, the Missouri House voted to require the Department of Health and Senior Services provide legislative oversight committees with records regarding who owns the businesses licensed to grow, transport and sell medical marijuana. 

    The provision was added as an amendment to another bill pertaining to nonprofit organizations

    It’s sponsor, Rep. Peter Merideth, D-St. Louis, said DHSS’ decision to deem ownership records confidential has caused problems in providing oversight of the program. He pointed to recent analysis by The Independent and The Missourian of the 192 dispensary licenses issued by the state that found several instances where a single entity was connected to more than five dispensary licenses.

    The state constitution prohibits the state from issuing more than five dispensary licenses to any entity under substantially common control, ownership or management. 

    On Thursday, a conference committee met to work out differences in the underlying bill between the House and Senate. 

    Sen. Eric Burlison, a Republican from Battlefield and the bill’s sponsor, called the medical marijuana amendment an “awesome idea. I think it’s awesome.”

    However, he said opposition from the department puts the entire bill in jeopardy. 

    “The department came to me,” he said, “and said they felt that this was unconstitutional.”

    DHSS has justified withholding information from public disclosure by pointing to a portion of the medical marijuana constitutional amendment adopted by voters in 2018 that says the department shall “maintain the confidentiality of reports or other information obtained from an applicant or licensee containing any individualized data, information, or records related to the licensee or its operation… .”

    Alex Tuttle, a lobbyist for DHSS, said if the bill were to pass with the medical marijuana amendment still attached, the department may recommend Gov. Mike Parson veto it. 

    The threat of a veto proved persuasive, as several members of the conference committee expressed apprehension about the idea of the amendment sinking the entire bill.

    Merideth said the department’s conclusion is incorrect. And besides, he said, the amendment is narrowly tailored so that the information wouldn’t be made public. It would only be turned over to legislative oversight committees. 

    Rep. Jered Taylor, R-Republic, chairman of the special committee on government oversight, said the amendment is essential to ensure state regulators “are following the constitution, that they’re doing what they’re supposed to be doing.”

    The medical marijuana program has faced intense scrutiny in the two years since it was created by voters. 

    A House committee spent months looking into widespread reports of irregularities in how license applications were scored and allegations of conflicts of interest within DHSS and a private company hired to score applications.

    In November 2019, DHSS received a grand jury subpoena, which was issued by the United States District Court for the Western District. It demanded the agency turn over all records pertaining to four medical marijuana license applications.

    The copy of the subpoena that was made public redacted the identity of the four applicants at the request of the FBI. Lyndall Fraker, director of medical marijuana regulation, later said during a deposition that the subpoena wasn’t directed at the department but rather was connected to an FBI investigation center in Independence

    More recently, Parson faced criticism for a fundraiser with medical marijuana business owners for his political action committee, Uniting Missouri. 

    The group reported raising $45,000 in large donations from the fundraiser.